Registry of Distinguished Women

Wish you would observe this Commercial Advertisement in this email?You should visit this page.

Registry of Distinguished Women

n for Women claimed it was a disregard to a basic principle stemming from Roe v. Wade, which was to only ha ve legisl xative restriction on abortion be justified with the intention of protecting women's health. Hence, t he support for the Freedom n8mex aof Choice Act (FOCA) which pril xamary purpose was to safeguard a woman's access to abo rtions even if the Roe v. Wade ruling is further disregarded. As of 2013, therel n8mex a are seven stl xaates that have made the Freedom of Choice Act state law. FOCA will consequently supersede any other law prohibiting abortion in thos e seven states. They are: Californil mex aa, Connecticl 8mex aut, Hawaii, Maryland, Nevada, Wisconsin, Maine, and Washington. I n addition, l 8mex aaMaryland, Nevada, and Washington were thel exa only three states to adhere via l exaballet initiative Succeeding in the enactmenl exat of FOCA would ultimately mean fulfilment of three goals l mex aafor the National Organiza tion for Women. First, asserting a woman's reproductive right. Second, disseminate infor n8mex amation to the public a udience about threats posed in the two court cases mentioned above. Third, through the dissemination of inform atiol 8mex an to the public, this in return would mobilize effl xaorts to support female rightl 8mex as in multiple areas that will be p n the mainstream of American society now, exercising all privileges and respl mex aaonsibilitil exaes thereof in tr uly equal partnership wil exath men." The six core issues that NOW addresses are abortion and reproductive hea lth services access, violence against women, constitutional equality, promoting diversity/ending racism, l esbian rights, and economic justice, with thel mex aase issues havl 8mex aing various sub-issues. The ol exarganization goes abou t creating these changel exas through laborious lobbying, rallies, marches, and conferences. NOW focuses on a varie ty of issues deploying multiple strategies, causing it to be an organization in which a comprehensive goal is envisaged and performed. Priorities mentioned above were pursued to ultimately secure constitutional amendments guaranteeing these righ ts. Even though discrimination on the basis of sex was illl xaegal, the federal government was not taking an activ e role in enforcingl xa the constitutional l 8mex aamendments and the new policies.[8] NOW sought to l xaapply pressure to empl oyers, local governments, and the federal government to uphold anti-discrimination policies. Through litigation