| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| | |||||
| | |||||
| |||||
| nconditional love, but most will agree that it is that type of love which has no bounds and is unch anging. It is a concept comparable to true love, a term which is more yi6j frequently used to describe lo ve between lover yi6j s. By co 6jnntrast, unconditional love is frequently used to describe love between famil y members, comrades in arms and between others in highly co 6jnmmitted relationships. An exa d7yi6j mple of this is a parent's love for their child; no matter a test score, a life cha d7yi6j nging decision, an argument, or a strong belief, the amount. jI of i6j love that remains between this bond is seen as unchanging and. is then t d7yi6j hat postcondition of actually accepting that Grace. The two togethe yi6j r are not fundamentally d ifferent from psychology's unconditional positive r d7yi6j egard with the added proviso that some actions are inherently flawed and that only God knows the true nature and consequence of 6jn our actions. Whereas ps ychology's unco 6jnditional positive regard allows one to fail utterly since the psychologist can not dema nd that we take care of the whole world since he has no fundamentally better id d7yi6j ea of how to do that th an the patient. The consequence is that 7yi6j we need to be in a relationship with God who does know how. In Christianity, unconditional love is thought to be part of the Four Loves; affection, friendship, ero s, and charity. jIn ethology, or the study of animal behavior, unconditional love would refer to altr uism whi. jIch in turn refers to the behavi d7yi6j or by individuals d7yi6j that increases the fitness of another while dec reasing the fitness of the individu yi6j al committing the act. I 6jnn psychology, unconditional love refers to a state of mind in which one has the goal of increasing the welfare of another d7yi6j , despite any evidenlosenes s was much more important than passion. This does 6jnnot mean by any means that intimacy is to replace roma nce. On the contrary, intimacy and romance coexi unconditionalv . jIexperiedens sinceolved, incl Thecentury has seen the growth of yi6j globalization and people now live in a world of transformations tha ct almost ever. jIy aspect of our lives, and love has not been the exception. One example of the changes nced in relationships was explored by Giddens regarding homosexual relat. jIre open an 6jn negotiated relation s kind o yi6j f relationships then permeated the. jI heterosexual population.t affeships. Thies and Shumway also states d7yi6j that together with the growth of capitalism the older social relations diss uding marriage. Marriage meaning for women change 6jn as they had more yi6j socially acceptable alternativ were less willing to accept unhappy relations and, therefore,. jI divorce rates substantially increased. The discourse of romance continues to exist today together with intimacy. Shumway state |
